The patents office, the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property, could have a decisive role in this, if it demands that inventors comply with the requirement of industrial application for the objects they are claiming.
如果要求發明者服從他們所主張的目標上的工業應用的要求，墨西哥工業產權研究院專利辦公室在這其中扮演著決定性的角色，
Furthermore, the concept of utility handled by the patent office of the United States must not be accepted, since, for the effects of filing patents, it is only necessary to show that the invention is useful, not that it may have an industrial application. Another fundamental aspect to be considered if the intellectual property system is to contribute to innovation without necessarily being an entry barrier, is that clear limits must be placed on the temporary monopoly conferred by the different titles, thus creating a counterpart of the anti-monopoly law. This aspect should be reviewed in Mexican legislation since the Law on Economic Competition justly establishes the cases in which intellectual property protection exists as an exception to its actions against monopolistic practices. A further element to avoid anti-competitive practices and, eventually, practices that do not satisfy the needs of the market at reasonable prices, is to use clear criteria and to work on the introduction of a compulsory licensing regime in accordance with international commitments, and the introduction of effective price control mechanisms.
此外，不能接受美國專利辦公室所處理的效用概念，因為，就申報專利的效果來說，僅有必要表明該發明是有用處的，而不用表明它可能有某種工業應用性。如果知識產權體系有益於創新，而不是壹定會成為進入障礙，則需要考慮另壹個基礎方面，即應該對由不同權利賦予的暫時性壟斷設置明確的限制，從而創造壹個與反壟斷法相對應的環境。這點應該經過墨西哥立法機關的審查，因為經濟競爭法公正地設立了這樣壹個案例，在其中，對於打擊壟斷性措施的行動來說，知識產權保護作為壹個例外而存在。為了避免反競爭措施以及無法在合理價位滿足市場需求的措施，更深的舉措應是根據國際承諾采用清晰的標準以及致力於引入強制許可證制度，引入有效的價格控制機制。
Finally, the use of patent systems to introduce a model that benefits the distribution ofknowledge above the traditional philosophy of protecting and excluding third parties, means that more public and private institutions should become involved in the tasks of
retrieving, analysing and using patent information. It is not enough to have information banks; networks must be built up to diffuse competitive intelligence based on information, the technologies necessary to process it and a portfolio of attractive services.
最後，為了引入有益於傳播關於保護和剔除第三方的傳統哲學知識的模型，使用專利體系意味著更多的公眾和個人研究院應參與到檢索、反洗和使用專利信息的任務重來，僅擁有資料庫是不夠的，必須在信息的基礎上建立起網絡以傳播競爭情報、加工情報的技術以及有吸引力的服務組合。Figure 2 shows a stimulating model for the development of information services proposed by Lozano and Vald~s (1995). If it proves possible to build networks in which many institutions participate following the lines of this model, an important step will have been taken to demolish entry barriers and use intellectual property as a vehicle for innovation.
表2展示了由洛紮諾及巴爾德斯（1995）提出的信息服務發展刺激模型，如果建立可以由許多研究院按照該模型範圍進行參與的網絡被證明是可行的，則必須邁出重要壹步，掃除進入障礙並將知識產權作為創新工作。
英語牛人團傾情奉獻，腦力結晶，手工創作，滿意請記得及時采納哦，謝謝^_^